<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Credibility from stating the obvious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/</link>
	<description>Made to Stick Blog by Dan and Chip Heath</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:22:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jen_chan, writer SureFireWealth.com</title>
		<link>http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-4486</link>
		<dc:creator>jen_chan, writer SureFireWealth.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/#comment-4486</guid>
		<description>By not hiding your product&#039;s limitations, you appear more real. Customers tend to trust you even more because they know they won&#039;t encounter unwanted &quot;surprises&quot; down the road. Though I think there is a proper way of going about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By not hiding your product&#8217;s limitations, you appear more real. Customers tend to trust you even more because they know they won&#8217;t encounter unwanted &#8220;surprises&#8221; down the road. Though I think there is a proper way of going about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-4472</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/#comment-4472</guid>
		<description>The water in San Francisco may be good enough to drink from the tap, but in Los Angeles, our idiotic City Council mandated the addition of fluoride, a known carcinogen, with the idea of raising the quality of dental care for poor minority children.  As a consequence, I even buy bottked water for my dog and would never drink our tap water.  The fact that a point is valid in one location doesn&#039;t mean that all of the variables are the same somewhere else and you therefor can&#039;t extrapolate a generalization from the first point of reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The water in San Francisco may be good enough to drink from the tap, but in Los Angeles, our idiotic City Council mandated the addition of fluoride, a known carcinogen, with the idea of raising the quality of dental care for poor minority children.  As a consequence, I even buy bottked water for my dog and would never drink our tap water.  The fact that a point is valid in one location doesn&#8217;t mean that all of the variables are the same somewhere else and you therefor can&#8217;t extrapolate a generalization from the first point of reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-4369</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/#comment-4369</guid>
		<description>Thanks David.  And Steve, I think if I&#039;d read the subtext as &quot;we didn&#039;t try too hard to find good ones ... lackadaisical effort,&quot; then I&#039;d probably agree with you.  That wasn&#039;t my read on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David.  And Steve, I think if I&#8217;d read the subtext as &#8220;we didn&#8217;t try too hard to find good ones &#8230; lackadaisical effort,&#8221; then I&#8217;d probably agree with you.  That wasn&#8217;t my read on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rowley</title>
		<link>http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-4345</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/#comment-4345</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big fan of the blog, but I have to admit I had exactly the opposite reaction.  Being a wine enthusiast, I followed the link before reading the rest of the post, and when I reached the exact sentence quoted, I quit reading and went back to the post.  My reaction was &quot;hey, they didn&#039;t try that hard to find good wines, so why should I read any more?&quot;  I was surprised when I got back to the post to find it devoted to praising the very line that made me lose interest.   Not an invalid point in principle, but this example didn&#039;t fit.  If the story&#039;s author admitted that maybe it&#039;s impossible to find the best of the best, that would be credible, but the &quot;we drank some cheap wines, and we didn&#039;t try too hard to find good ones, but read on to hear the results of our lackadaisical effort,&quot; approach had the opposite effect on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of the blog, but I have to admit I had exactly the opposite reaction.  Being a wine enthusiast, I followed the link before reading the rest of the post, and when I reached the exact sentence quoted, I quit reading and went back to the post.  My reaction was &#8220;hey, they didn&#8217;t try that hard to find good wines, so why should I read any more?&#8221;  I was surprised when I got back to the post to find it devoted to praising the very line that made me lose interest.   Not an invalid point in principle, but this example didn&#8217;t fit.  If the story&#8217;s author admitted that maybe it&#8217;s impossible to find the best of the best, that would be credible, but the &#8220;we drank some cheap wines, and we didn&#8217;t try too hard to find good ones, but read on to hear the results of our lackadaisical effort,&#8221; approach had the opposite effect on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rendall</title>
		<link>http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-4295</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madetostick.com/blog/2007/09/21/credibility-from-stating-the-obvious/#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>Fantastic! Your example was the perfect complement to my last blog entry about admitting weaknesses in job interviews. When trying to get a job, most people try to hide their limitations and fear the consequences of being open about them. Your post provides another strong reason to be honest. I just posted a new entry, SalesFreak, and linked to your blog and book. Thanks for the material. 

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic! Your example was the perfect complement to my last blog entry about admitting weaknesses in job interviews. When trying to get a job, most people try to hide their limitations and fear the consequences of being open about them. Your post provides another strong reason to be honest. I just posted a new entry, SalesFreak, and linked to your blog and book. Thanks for the material. </p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
